|
Yes, but you have to play the record backwards. Same is true for the Beatles "White Album", I think.
"A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants"
Chuckles the clown
|
|
|
|
|
How do you do that today, when you access all your music from a streaming service?
Even with CDs, it takes some effort.
The only way I can think of is to read the music into a sound editor capable of reversing a clip. At least the simple ones do not have that capability. You could of course write your own program (this is, after all, a site for programmers  ) to do it, but then you first have to decode the file from whatever compression format, and, unless you do the compressed-to-wav yourself so you have the file in memory, you will have to learn the details of the .wav format.
It can be arranged, yes it can be arranged.
|
|
|
|
|
trønderen wrote: How do you do that today, when you access all your music from a streaming service?
Good question.
It must prove that digital copies are just an international conspiracy which is attempting to hide the true messages contained in the media.
Makes one wonder though what podcasts played in reverse might say.
|
|
|
|
|
trønderen wrote: The only way I can think of is to read the music into a sound editor capable of reversing a clip. At least the simple ones do not have that capability.
If you have a file you can read (and not a stream), Audacity can reverse a clip.
|
|
|
|
|
It is a secret but I am positive you can copy any stream to a file.
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck finding the end of a live, continuous stream. :-p
But I know what you mean. That's how, after all, streams end up on pirate sites.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually the most likely murder (or serious injury) was by the parents whose expensive record deck's precision tone arm and pickup had been damaged by some fool forcibly spinning the turntable backwards!
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: someone is still trying to claim heavy metal will make you want to murder your parents and such.
Definitely.
Or whatever else they don't like.
|
|
|
|
|
If there is a single unambiguous and undisputed definition of what is "moral", and this definition is associated with institutions promoting certain kind of music, it comes natural: Those who support those institutions and their morals, have higher tendency to listen to the kind of music promoted by those institutions.
Except that I will never agree that there is a single unambiguous and undisputed definition of what is "moral". E.g. I strongly object to a great number of the practices of the Christian religion as being "moral" - even though they themselves hold it up as their "moral".
A second thing: I have for many years been singing in church choirs. Because the churches turns out to capture control over so much resources that they can pay some very good conductors. I listen to a lot of church music, because the Christian churches for centuries have had enough resources to grab the best composers, paying them to make music to support the ideas of the church. That was the way to make a living in earlier days: To work for the church. Today, the way to find a place to sing under a great conductor: Search the church choirs.
I do. Both listening and singing. I do it for the music. Some of the moral, I detest. Some of my true morals would make church people (and maybe a fair share of others) throw up, if I revealed them. I don't. From my music preferences, you would say that I am a highly church moral person. And I'll let you all believe that; I am not revealing my true thoughts. I would strengthen the conclusions of this study. But it would be false.
|
|
|
|
|
Like music says something about personality?
I'd never date someone doing classic or folk.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Long time ago ...
I entered a tech. U where the Student Union had a strong radio amateur ('ham') group. Holding a ham license, I applied for membership. Like so many student groups, they have strict rules for accepting new members, far beyond just signing up. So I was called to an interview, to verify that I would fit into the group.
At that time, I listened a lot to classical music, and it happened that I had already bought a concert ticket conflicting with the time for the interview. So I returned a reply, asking if the interview could be moved to a different time.
I didn't hear anything more from the ham group for several weeks. In the meantime, I had heard from a friend of mine already a member of the ham group that there had been a discussion whether someone who listens to classical music would fit into the group. When they after several weeks came up with a new time for an interview, I decided: If it was considered seriously to refuse to accept my membership in the ham group because of my musical taste, then I guess that the social environment in that group would not be one where I would enjoy myself, regardless of which musical taste we are talking about. So I reported back that I was no longer interested.
I guess that (e.g. based on chromosomes) being dated by you would be outside my interests anyway. Even if it was, after your remark I would turn it down anyway, for similar reasons. My classical music period was over decades ago, but now that you state that I would have been rejected anyway if I had kept my sense of classical music,
You make me suspect that for you, friendships are similar: You couldn't be a close friend to someone doing classical or folk (regardless of XY). Then I say: OK, so let's not be close friends, then. A friendship requiring identical musical tastes sounds rather fragile to me.
You might be joking. But even if you are joking, I can very well imagine people of that attitude (ref. that ham group). If you tell me that you are joking, I might want to introduce some of my favorite folk music to you ... 
|
|
|
|
|
It is called sarcasm.
There "might" be a difference between me and people listening to folk. And who would have forseen that is a part of the profile that ad agencies build up?
I mean, those must be the most ethical agencies that exist? It is not like they would place profit over morals? 
trønderen wrote: I guess that (e.g. based on chromosomes) being dated by you would be outside my interests anyway. Even if it was, after your remark I would turn it down anyway, for similar reasons. My classical music period was over decades ago
Girl, that is determined by chromosomes, and whether or not we could reproduce. It had nothing to do with gender, nor music, but biology.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Ya ... everyday I come to a Crossroads: Orinoco Flow or Stranglehold. Autobahn or Hot Rod Lincoln. Message in a Bottle, or The Letter. Grazing in the Grass, or Incense and Peppermints ...
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Ha! Good luck. I already sold mine. 
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure you'll iron things out.
As the aircraft designer said, "Simplicate and add lightness".
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.3.0 JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: SimpleWizardUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
htcw definitely needs to add a SOAP API to the SVG package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
look forward to your new C# code...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Greenwashing, sportswashing, #-washing ...
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: code laundering
Long back, it was called as "porting", isn't it?
modified 2 days ago.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: He called it "code laundering"
As I understand that is incorrect application of the term.
honey the codewitch wrote: defunct open source project
The defunct part is irrelevant. What matters is what the actual license is. The most liberal type of that license says basically 'do whatever you want just don't cry if it fails'. If that is the license then it does in fact explicitly give you the right to port it and thus it is not 'laundering'.
There are many variations of 'open source' licensing though. And some would fall into that category depending on what you intend to do with the code.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure he was joking. The defunct part is only relevant inasmuch as I cannot contact the author.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: as I cannot contact the author.
Which is not necessary if it is the type of open source licensing that I suggested.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
